Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: update file response #1161

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

himanshu-dixit
Copy link
Collaborator

@himanshu-dixit himanshu-dixit commented Jan 6, 2025

Important

Update fileResponseProcessor to prepend random string to file name and return file_uri_path instead of file.

  • Behavior:
    • In fileResponseProcessor, prepend a random string to the file name using Math.random().
    • Remove file property from toolResponse.data after processing.
    • Return toolResponse with file_uri_path instead of file.
  • Misc:
    • Use optional chaining for toolResponse.data.file in fileResponseProcessor.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 69cdadc. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 6, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
composio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 6, 2025 0:11am

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to d4412d9 in 11 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 34 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 2 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. js/src/sdk/utils/processor/file.ts:25
  • Draft comment:
    Ensure toolResponse.data exists before deleting file.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful.
2. js/src/sdk/utils/processor/file.ts:21
  • Draft comment:
    Consider using a more secure method than Math.random() for generating random strings if security is a concern.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 50%
    The change in file naming introduces a random string for uniqueness, which is a good practice. However, the use of Math.random() for generating a random string is not cryptographically secure. If security is a concern, consider using a more secure method.

Workflow ID: wflow_lkKqqVWR1USeDNnc


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2025

This comment was generated by github-actions[bot]!

JS SDK Coverage Report

📊 Coverage report for JS SDK can be found at the following URL:
https://pub-92e668239ab84bfd80ee07d61e9d2f40.r2.dev/coverage-12632251374/coverage/index.html

📁 Test report folder can be found at the following URL:
https://pub-92e668239ab84bfd80ee07d61e9d2f40.r2.dev/html-report-12632251374/html-report/report.html

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 69cdadc in 10 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 12 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 0 drafted comments based on config settings.

Workflow ID: wflow_WZN9tdd7zVcRkZNB


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

const responseData =
(toolResponse.data.response_data as Record<string, unknown>) || {};
const fileData = responseData.file as
const fileData = toolResponse?.data?.file as
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

format change, earlier format was different

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants